The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld Gujarat government’s decision to allocate 1,000 acres of land in Mundra for development of a special economic zone (SEZ) by Adani Port and Special Economic Zone, by dismissing a Special Leave Petition challenging the allocation on grounds of lack of merit.
A division bench comprising Justice K. S. Radhakrishnan and Justice Dipak Misra dismissed the petition filed by residents of Zarpara village and few members of its Gram Panchayat on grounds of lack of merit and refused to overrule the Gujarat High Court’s judgment dated June 22, 2011. The bench observed that the Gujarat government was statutorily empowered to allocate the land and declined the petitioner’s request for allocation of an alternate 1,000 acre pastoral wasteland to the Zarpara Panchayat.
The Gujarat government had allotted 1,000 acres of pastoral land at Zarpara to Adani Port and SEZ in 2007. However, this allocation was challenged in the Gujarat High Court via multiple public interest litigations, which were dismissed on June 22, 2011. The petitioners then approached the SC alleging that the land allotment was illegal and arbitrary and had disturbed the ratio of cattle to pastoral land in the village as prescribed by the state government.
Adani Ports and SEZ contested these allegations and stated that the land was allotted as per the law. The Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1993 empowers the state government to resume the land from a village Panchayat and allot it for purpose of setting up a Special Economic Zone, which caters to the public at large. The company also submitted before the Apex Court that it had paid the price of the land at the rate of 130% of the prevailing market value, including a 30% premium.
| Company Name | CMP |
|---|---|
| Adani Ports &Special | 1192.15 |
| JSW Infrastructure | 313.00 |
| Gujarat Pipavav Port | 181.75 |
| Paradeep Parivahan | |
| View more.. | |
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Make an informed decision for Stocks
Invest using an intelligent system with powerful data-driven tools that help you identify opportunities and make informed buy-hold-sell decisions
Buy quality Stocks when they are available at reasonable prices and supported by an upward price trend and Sell when they are Overvalued using the Decizen Rating System. Covers 3500+ stocks
Limited to the first 10 users today!
Practical Stock Investing Hand Book
By - Raymond Moses
Founder of MoneyWorks4Me | Consultant | Trainer | Author | TEDx Speaker
Register & Get Instant Access!Don't miss out! First 10 users today get it FREE
With this 4 hrs Masterclass, you’ll be able to:
Download APP
