Categorisation of stocks based on nature of business and financial parameters like assets, cash flows, debt, growth, value creation & more. In addition to sector diversification, a portfolio could be optimally diversified with the help of such categorization. This categorization helps you decide how much to invest in different categories based on your Risk profile. This investment style was developed by famous investor "Peter Lynch".
Small and Medium companies with high expected growth rates. They could be niche innovative companies, operating in untouched markets or they could other companies operating in big markets. Their value creation could be subdued due to high levels of investment. Timely investment matters as such stocks could become fairly or over valued as soon as the market realizes their potential.
|
|
  Company Name
|
CMP
|
Price
Change |
Market
Cap (Cr) |
Net Sales
(Rs. Cr.) |
Latest EPS
(Rs.) |
Net Profit
Margin % |
Latest P/E
|
Latest P/BV
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,887.5 | 109.8 ( 6.18%) | Mid Cap | 12,635 | 109.9 | 32.05 | 17.2 | 3 | |||
| 2 | 1,242.1 | 35.65 ( 2.95%) | Large Cap | 12,884 | 45.8 | 20.77 | 27.1 | 4.9 | |||
| 3 | 1,566.9 | 29.9 ( 1.95%) | Mid Cap | 6,124 | 25.6 | 9.66 | 61.1 | 5.9 | |||
| 4 | 6,453.5 | 86.85 ( 1.36%) | Mid Cap | 3,552 | 131.2 | 22.12 | 49.3 | 16.2 | |||
| 5 | 459 | 5.85 ( 1.29%) | Small Cap | 2,896 | 10.1 | 5.4 | 45.8 | 5 | |||
| 6 | 1,279.1 | 14.65 ( 1.16%) | Large Cap | 26,711 | 45.4 | 31.11 | 28.2 | 4.8 | |||
| 7 | 2,887.1 | 26.8 ( 0.94%) | Small Cap | 4,209 | 70.1 | 19.04 | 41 | 9.8 | |||
| 8 | 836.1 | 7.6 ( 0.92%) | Small Cap | 483 | 24.4 | 32.69 | 34.7 | 4.1 | |||
| 9 | 829.1 | 5.6 ( 0.68%) | Small Cap | 3,523 | 61.6 | 21.31 | 13.5 | 2.4 | |||
| 10 | 983 | 6.55 ( 0.67%) | Small Cap | 572 | 15.9 | 12.26 | 62.1 | 10.7 | |||
| 11 | 1,181.5 | 6.45 ( 0.55%) | Large Cap | 14,096 | -3.6 | 8.3 | - | 9.9 | |||
| 12 | 2,968.2 | 14.5 ( 0.49%) | Small Cap | 1,967 | 52.2 | 19.53 | 56.9 | 12 | |||
| 13 | 5,762.9 | 18.5 ( 0.32%) | Large Cap | 7,845 | 69.2 | 20.16 | 83.3 | 11.1 | |||
| 14 | 1,048.3 | 2.85 ( 0.27%) | Small Cap | 10,020 | -84.1 | -16.8 | - | 0.9 | |||
| 15 | 6,566.7 | 13.75 ( 0.21%) | Large Cap | 54,969 | 248 | 26.29 | 26.5 | 4.7 | |||
| 16 | 3,105.7 | 3.3 ( 0.11%) | Large Cap | 10,728 | 53.2 | 14.77 | 58.4 | 14 | |||
| 17 | 1,562.4 | 0.25 ( 0.02%) | Large Cap | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| 18 | 3,419.2 | 0.05 ( 0%) | Mid Cap | 7,226 | 60.5 | 12.63 | 56.6 | 10.4 | |||
| 19 | 1,617.7 | -0.65 ( -0.04%) | Large Cap | 18,550 | 22.7 | 6.7 | 71.4 | 13 | |||
| 20 | 113.3 | -0.05 ( -0.04%) | Small Cap | 5,362 | 18.1 | 10 | 6.3 | 0.7 | |||
| 21 | 786.1 | -0.8 ( -0.1%) | Mid Cap | 8,632 | 20.6 | 14.3 | 38.2 | 3.9 | |||
| 22 | 607.2 | -0.75 ( -0.12%) | Mid Cap | 5,341 | 2.9 | 4.73 | 210.7 | 17.5 | |||
| 23 | 5,508.7 | -14 ( -0.25%) | Mid Cap | 9,748 | 176.5 | 18.13 | 31.2 | 5.6 | |||
| 24 | 164.9 | -0.55 ( -0.33%) | Large Cap | 98,692 | 5.4 | 3.24 | 30.6 | 3.6 | |||
| 25 | 144.4 | -0.65 ( -0.45%) | Small Cap | 189 | 0.2 | -351.25 | 822.8 | 2.1 | |||
| 26 | 2,024 | -9.35 ( -0.46%) | Small Cap | 1,208 | 28.9 | 10.98 | 70.5 | 8.8 | |||
| 27 | 389.4 | -1.85 ( -0.47%) | Small Cap | 4,530 | 5.4 | 1.38 | 71.5 | 4.2 | |||
| 28 | 14,574 | -75.45 ( -0.52%) | Small Cap | 3,784 | 215.8 | 10.54 | 67.6 | 9.3 | |||
| 29 | 1,024.2 | -5.65 ( -0.55%) | Small Cap | 6,229 | 32.9 | 9.63 | 31.2 | 4.1 | |||
| 30 | 690.1 | -4.1 ( -0.59%) | Large Cap | - | 7.9 | - | 87.7 | 9.5 | |||
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Make an informed decision for Stocks
Buy quality Stocks when they are available at reasonable prices and supported by an upward price trend and Sell when they are Overvalued using the Decizen Rating System. Covers 3500+ stocks
Download APP
